Biblioteca clínica

Modelos

Entra para guardar tu sesión o suscríbete para abrir la biblioteca completa. Puedes seguir gratis con fichas parciales.

¿Prefieres esperar? Déjame tu correo: te aviso cuando abra el acceso completo y tendrás precio de fundador.

TU MENTOR · ATLASAtlas de la psicoterapia
Vista
Home

Psychoanalysis · 1952

Object Relations (Fairbairn)

The human being is oriented towards the bond: even suffering is fidelity to an internal object.

Ronald Fairbairn's object relations theory proposes that fundamental human motivation is the search for relationship with an object rather than drive discharge, conceiving the ego as an originally relational structure organised through the internalisation of early bonds with significant figures. When those relationships are frustrating or traumatic, the ego splits into substructures — central ego, libidinal ego and antilibidinal ego — tied to idealised or rejecting internal part-objects, producing an inner world dominated by internalised bonds that tend to repeat compulsively in adult life. Psychopathology is understood as a fixation to these pathological internal relationships, sustained by the hope of repairing the object, and therapeutic change occurs when the analytic relationship makes it possible to recognise, work through and integrate these splits, freeing the central ego to establish more mature and realistic external relationships (Ref: Fairbairn 1952).

Theory of change

A person changes when they stop living in submission to pathological internal objects and can integrate their splits in order to relate to real objects.

Core ideas

  1. Libido is object-seeking from the outset

    Fairbairn holds that libido seeks not discharge but an object. This claim radically transforms classical psychoanalytic theory: the bond is not secondary to the drive but primary. Psychic structure is organised around internalised relationships, not around an economy of energy.

  2. The ego fragments itself in order to preserve the bond

    Faced with a frustrating object, the child does not give up the bond but splits the ego in order to keep the relationship. Pathology is not the result of excess drive, but of structural adaptation to relational trauma.

  3. Psychopathology is loyalty to the internal object

    Suffering persists because the person maintains unconscious fidelity to the rejecting or exciting object, hoping to transform it. This loyalty accounts for relational repetition and for the difficulty of giving up harmful bonds.

  4. Conflict is structural, not merely dynamic

    Conflict does not occur solely between drive and defence, but between parts of the ego tied to different internal objects. The internal saboteur (the antilibidinal ego) reproduces the voice of the rejecting object, attacking the libidinal ego.

  5. Transference is a reactivation of the inner world

    The therapeutic relationship makes it possible to observe how internal objects are projected and how they organise expectations towards the analyst. The work consists in making this relational organisation conscious so that integration becomes possible.

  6. Change involves both integration and renunciation

    Integration of the ego requires mourning for the early object that was not good enough. Only by giving up the hope of an impossible repair can the central ego invest in more mature external relationships.

  7. A theory of the bond that precedes attachment theory

    Although he wrote before Bowlby, Fairbairn lays the foundations for a structural conception of attachment: the human being is oriented towards relationship from the outset, and pathology derives from internalised frustrating bonds.

Influences

  • Child psychoanalysis and the internal object
  • Object relations (Klein)
  • Ego psychology
  • Phenomenology / Hermeneutics

Key references

  • Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality.