Psychoanalysis · 1975
Modern object relations (Kernberg)
When identity is split, the bond is lived at the extremes; change comes with the integration of love and aggression within one and the same representation.
Otto F. Kernberg develops a structural theory of object relations that integrates Kleinian contributions with ego psychology in order to explain the organisation of personality, especially at the borderline and narcissistic levels. He proposes that identity is constituted through the progressive integration of affect-laden representations of self and object, initially split into idealised and persecutory configurations. When this integration fails, primitive defences predominate — splitting, idealisation, devaluation and projective identification — giving rise to identity diffusion, impulsivity and chaotic relationships. Clinical technique centres on the systematic analysis of the transference, in which the split relational dyads are activated live. The therapeutic aim is to integrate love and aggression, strengthen identity and promote a more mature organisation of the self and of relationships. This framework gave rise to Transference-Focused Psychotherapy (TFP), one of the psychodynamic treatments with the strongest empirical support for personality disorders.
Core ideas
-
Personality is organised into structures, not only into symptoms
For Kernberg, psychopathology is not adequately understood on the basis of isolated symptoms, but from the level of structural organisation of the personality. What is central is not what happens to the person, but how their identity is organised, which type of defences predominate and how self- and object-representations relate to one another. This perspective makes it possible to distinguish neurotic, borderline and psychotic organisations, and to understand why similar interventions can have radically different effects depending on the underlying structure.
-
Identity is built by integrating split representations
Identity is formed through the progressive integration of self- and object-representations laden with positive and negative affect. In borderline and narcissistic organisations, these representations remain split into idealised and persecutory configurations, which gives rise to identity diffusion, extreme relationships and intense affects. The therapeutic aim is not to eliminate aggression or to idealise the bond, but to allow love and hate to coexist within one and the same integrated representation.
-
Primitive defences protect identity, but fragment it
Defences such as splitting, idealisation, devaluation and projective identification serve a protective function against intolerable affects, especially aggression and the fear of abandonment. Their predominant use, however, prevents psychic integration and maintains chaotic, disorganised relationships. Clinical work does not seek to eliminate these defences directly, but to make them conscious, understand their function and facilitate more mature forms of regulation and symbolisation.
-
The transference is the privileged setting for change
Internal relational configurations are not accessed mainly through historical narrative; they are activated live within the therapeutic relationship. In the transference, the split self–object dyads emerge with their full affective charge, making it possible to observe, analyse and transform them in the here-and-now. The therapeutic relationship is therefore not merely a means of support, but the principal technical instrument of structural change.
-
Change involves tolerating ambivalence and aggression without acting on them
Therapeutic progress becomes evident when the patient can hold ambivalent affects — love and hate, closeness and rejection — without resorting to acting out or to primitive defences. Learning to think aggression rather than act it is a central milestone of the treatment. This capacity marks the move from a fragmented organisation to a more integrated identity, with greater emotional and relational stability.
-
The frame and its limits are technical conditions for deep work
In patients with impulsivity and identity diffusion, the frame is not an administrative matter but an essential structural intervention. Clear limits, an explicit therapeutic contract and active management of acting out create the conditions of safety needed for the analysis of the transference to be possible without disorganisation. Without this support, deep exploration intensifies fragmentation rather than integrating it.
Influences
- Object relations (Klein)
- The structural model
- Ego psychology
- Phenomenology / Hermeneutics
- Social / relational constructionism
Key references
- Kernberg, O. F. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism.
- Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object Relations Theory and Clinical Psychoanalysis.
- Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. E., & Kernberg, O. F. (2006). Transference-Focused Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder.